Don't forget to do a git fetch --all --prune on other machines after deleting the remote branch on the server. I want to delete a branch both locally and on my remote project fork on. It just felt cleaner, and it probably also represents the state of the 2 branches more clearly as being in sync as they ought to be. Now you can do it with the app. How can I create my branch with minimal fuss? As mentioned in one of the other answers, -u will set the upstream so that a plain git push will work in the future. This is a bit of syntactic sugar, but if we think about it we didn't specify a local branch name. Thanks for your input Accepted answer, this is the way to disambiguate.
However, you can perform a git checkout on either a branch or a tag. Delete the old-name remote branch and push the new-name local branch. Is there a nice shortcut for this or should I just continue the long way? Or more accurately, we force-pushed the staging branch into the master branch. I've observed git fetch will add remotes, not remove them. Given the configuration in your question, your feature branch does not have a remote configured, so the above invocation is equivalent to the next example. Edge Out The Competition for your dream job with proven skills and certifications. If git-pull uses git-config branch.
Here's an example of when git remote prune origin will actually do something: User A does the steps above. I can push it to a different remote, for example, I can have my open source branches on github, and my closed branches on bitbucket. To proceed, you will need to have high level permissions at least write permissions, I think. Below are some of them and how I worked around them. My local git repo needs to pull from one server. This is what I was looking for.
I also create the image below to show the steps: Tip: When you delete branches using git branch -d deletes local branch or git push origin : deletes remote branch only the references are deleted. Anyway, what I remember is to start Git Gui from within Git Extensions when I need to delete a remote branch. In turn, they will receive the same error and may also force push creating a vicious cycle. Git Gui, TortoiseGit and GitHub Desktop have it - I wish Git Extensions had this functionality too. If you are on the branch you want to rename: git branch -m new-name If you are on a different branch: git branch -m old-name new-name 2. Normally when I do a push in git I do something like git push origin master, which really means push from the local branch named master to the remote branch named master. Master: git push In this video we'll learn some short hands and additional scenarios for git push.
If we have to pass git push the name of the branch, this means we'll need to type a different git push command for each branch. To delete that actual remote branch, you need git push origin --delete bugfix Additional Details The following sections describe additional details to consider when deleting your remote and remote-tracking branches. In order to achieve what I want I have to do git push review hotfix:JistChanges Is there some way to make git pull do this without having to put in the extra stuff? In we covered the most common usage of git push by passing the remote name followed by the branch name. Then you should execute this on other machines git fetch --all --prune to propagate changes. However they also change the upstream and where the pull comes from.
This is the default operation mode if no explicit refspec is found that is neither on the command line nor in any Push line of the corresponding remotes file—see below and no push. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform. I'm trying to push a new local branch product-0. Scott Chacon was right—I will want to that page or virtually dog ear by answering this on Stack Overflow. I would have considered asking my own question, but I tire of comments such as already asked before - imho: a question that is not understandable is not the same as a beginner question.
Check the man-page git config --help and search for push. If you force push your work you are effectively overwriting the remote history with your local history. But I faced some difficulties along the way the first time. This means we lost the commit from the register branch. I could look it up, sure, but if there was a short hand, like the dot, for that, it'd be cool. First of all, when you start working on any of remote branch you should create a local branch, corresponding to a given remote branch. This can happen if you deleted a remote branch directly through GitHub's web interface, for example.
Even if we don't pass the branch name to git push, Git will attempt to use the current branch. What happens when you do git push without arguments is influenced by your configuration. Doing so may not only lose work, but make it difficult for others to push their work as their branches will no longer match the remote branch. SourceTree will stumble on it and you'll be left to your own devices, with the command line as the only solution. By force pushing, we overwrote the commit history. The other 10% I can just do a git push other where other the same origin repo with the correct push configuration.